Academic Philosophy Events in the Netherlands

All events in academic philosophy

Submit your own event

Loading Events

« All Events

  • This event has passed.

Overlooked Distinctions: the Mirage of Contingent A Priori

7 June @ 14:00 - 15:45

Description

Read More
As a follow-up to the Heyting Day https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/agenda/heyting-dag-2022-wittgensteins-tractatus our Heyting speaker Oskari Kuusela will give an extra lecture about the contingent a priori. Speaker: Oskari Kuusela, University of East Anglia Title: Overlooked Distinctions: the Mirage of Contingent A Priori Time: Tuesday, June 7, 16-18h. Location: Room 1.04 in the P.C. Hoofthuis https://www.uva.nl/locaties/binnenstad/pc-hoofthuis.html?origin=IP8Iuf%2BcSPCslmgojWcG4A&cb Extra: Oskari will be available to talk to masters and PhD students (of all universities) from 14.00-15.45h in Room 1.14 of the P.C. Hoofthuis. Abstract: In this paper I argue,…
As a follow-up to the Heyting Day https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/agenda/heyting-dag-2022-wittgensteins-tractatus our Heyting speaker Oskari Kuusela will give an extra lecture about the contingent a priori. Speaker: Oskari Kuusela, University of East Anglia Title: Overlooked Distinctions: the Mirage of Contingent A Priori Time: Tuesday, June 7, 16-18h. Location: Room 1.04 in the P.C. Hoofthuis https://www.uva.nl/locaties/binnenstad/pc-hoofthuis.html?origin=IP8Iuf%2BcSPCslmgojWcG4A&cb Extra: Oskari will be available to talk to masters and PhD students (of all universities) from 14.00-15.45h in Room 1.14 of the P.C. Hoofthuis. Abstract: In this paper I argue, with reference to Wittgenstein’s discussion of the standard metre in the Philosophical Investigations, that Kripke’s introduction of the epistemological-metaphysical category of contingent a priori in Naming and Necessity fails, due to his overlooking certain important distinctions in the use of relevant expressions and due to his unrecognized or unacknowledged wavering between different uses of relevant sentences. If the argument is correct, the notion of contingent a priori truths that Kripke seeks to introduce is a philosophical mirage that arises from bending the use of relevant sentences similarly to how the bending of light waves can create a mirage. I conclude with a discussion of the logical status of definitions, and by outlining an alternative Wittgensteinian account of relevant kinds of definitional sentences in terms of their non-temporal use. The advantage of this account is that it helps to keep track of the distinctions that Kripke overlooks, and that it avoids the problems raised by Donnellan and Salmon for Kripke regarding the notion of knowledge of contingent a priori truths.

Details

Date:
7 June
Time:
14:00 - 15:45

As a follow-up to the Heyting Day https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/agenda/heyting-dag-2022-wittgensteins-tractatus

our Heyting speaker Oskari Kuusela will give an extra lecture about the contingent a priori.

Speaker: Oskari Kuusela, University of East Anglia
Title: Overlooked Distinctions: the Mirage of Contingent A Priori
Time: Tuesday, June 7, 16-18h.
Location: Room 1.04 in the P.C. Hoofthuis
https://www.uva.nl/locaties/binnenstad/pc-hoofthuis.html?origin=IP8Iuf%2BcSPCslmgojWcG4A&cb
Extra: Oskari will be available to talk to masters and PhD students (of all universities) from
14.00-15.45h in Room 1.14 of the P.C. Hoofthuis.
Abstract:
In this paper I argue, with reference to Wittgenstein’s discussion of the standard metre in the Philosophical Investigations, that Kripke’s introduction of the epistemological-metaphysical category of contingent a priori in Naming and Necessity fails, due to his overlooking certain important distinctions in the use of relevant expressions and due to his unrecognized or unacknowledged wavering between different uses of relevant sentences. If the argument is correct, the notion of contingent a priori truths that Kripke seeks to introduce is a philosophical mirage that arises from bending the use of relevant sentences similarly to how the bending of light waves can create a mirage. I conclude with a discussion of the logical status of definitions, and by outlining an alternative Wittgensteinian account of relevant kinds of definitional sentences in terms of their non-temporal use. The advantage of this account is that it helps to keep track of the distinctions that Kripke overlooks, and that it avoids the problems raised by Donnellan and Salmon for Kripke regarding the notion of knowledge of contingent a priori truths.

Submit your own event

About the OZSW event calendar

The OZSW event calendar lists academic philosophy events organized by/at Dutch universities, and is offered by the OZSW as a service to the research community. Please check the event in question – through their website or organizer – to find out if you could participate and whether registration is required. Obviously we carry no responsibility for non-OZSW events.